Do you know what is the biggest weakness of Hindus? Its over-tolerance. Many think that divisions of castes and other sects were created by British. Some say it has been always the case. Well let us examine History carefully and try to look for answers.
Muslim rulers from Persia,Turkey and Afghan region continuously invaded India converted people forcibly but secular pigs will say-Oh Islam got prominence only because of peaceful Sufis. Even Sufis are Jihadists and portraying them as epitome of peace is big falsehood.
Greeks were defeated by India in BC times. Even after that we have seen some Greek intellectuals like Megastheses staying back in India to record events! Why?
Buddhist ideologues challenged the idea of Vedas they advocated austere lifestyle but there were grand Vihars(place where Buddhist preachers stay).
Ajathshatru who imprisoned his father and attacked his mother’s native kingdom organized First Buddhist council and Buddhists never opposed such a violent man!
I will not talk about Buddhism in details but want to describe how Sufi and Bhakti movements were conspiracy against Bharat and also examine how peace and Non-violence in excess reduce a society into laughing stock.
Never believe sweet words of foreign religions as Sufism is fraud, the peace message of Jesus was always followed by European invasion.
Whatever facts I am writing are well documented in NCERT History Books and also in some leading publications of India.
Flawed Interpretation of History
The History Departments of our country were occupied by Left jokers who had immense hatred for India and always tried to present facts in distorted forms. In some cases they crossed their limits by saying in few programs that Arabs were very progressive just to appease Muslims.
One basic argument of liberals is that Vedic Hindusim was dominated by Brahmans and literally they try to speak that foreign invaders did good by looting and killing Indians and converting some natives into Christianity or Islam.
Guptas who ruled most of Northern India were not Brahmans. Nagarjuna who Brahman, minister in the court of Kanishka converted into Buddhism and criticized Vedas,Hindu rituals.
It is often said that during Gupta period women rights had no values. Well it was a fairly good period for India as many foreign invaders were kept out of vision. It is peculiar to note that historians who are unable to tell estimated strength of Gupta’s army their war strategy are so confident about the fact that this Hindu empire was anti-women and Sati started in Gupta reign. I just want to ask that when no personal record of King justifies Sati how historians arrived at this conclusion. Also it is clearly mentioned in Ancient History Book of RS Sharma that during Gupta empire women had Land Rights.
Clearly it is evident that women exploitation as justified mass practice creeped into India only because of Islamic culture. Samudragupta is portrayed as aggressive King by historians but Akbar who invaded Rajasthan and Kashmir converted many Hindus by bribe or force is considered as very great King!!
I will also justify my point that how Bhakti movement was a conspiracy on the name of reform and how many historical facts are not mentioned enough number of times and gradually diluted.
Thinking deeply about Bhakti movement
In 711 AD Arab general Muhammad Qasim conquered Sindh. After the conquest, Muhammad bin Qasim’s task was to set up an administrative structure for a stable Muslim state that incorporated a newly conquered alien land, inhabited by non-Muslims.
He was a cruel ruler who sold many Hindu girls as sex slaves in Arab region. Well Indian Muslims consider this guy as hero and secular historians have no problem with him.He destroyed many temples looted gold and imposed jaziya tax on Non-Muslims.
It is interesting to note that only around 720 AD Naynars and Alvars ie separate group of Vishnu and Shiva worshipers came into existence. Instead of condemning Islamic conquest and foreign invasions they started creating divisions among Hindus. No one bothered to reconstruct demolished temples of North West. Logically it can be concluded that before further conquest Islam tried to create divisions Hindus and the money collected from jaziya tax helped them to do such plannings.
When Islam was unable to penetrate further easily they sent Sufism inside India as peaceful messengers. Pilgrimage called zirayat and tombs of Sufis could have hlped Muslim soldiers to hide inside.
Cruel Kings like Tughlaq gave patronage to Sufi and Chishtis clearly means that Sufism had hidden agenda of Islamic conquest. Bhakti movement was against use of Sanskrit teachings. They could have asked for education for all. I mean to say that there are millions of poor who are unable to get education but it does not mean that a movement should erupt which will ban use of English or Hindi!
The ideas used in Bhakti movements were like Abraham religion. Hindus believe in Brahma Vishnu Mahesh while Bhakti said only one God exist just like the teachings of Abraham religions. Even after the continuous Muslim invasions Bhakti movement advocated friendship of Ram and Rehman which is what present day secular ad Leftists Jihadis say!
Specifics of Lingayat within Bhakti movement
I am not against any community but want to explain the specific trends of separatism emerged within Hinduism. Lingayat community of Karnataka who are considered as people challenging Brahman traditions have strange elements within them.
Lingayat movement was started by Brahman named Basvanna(1106-1168) who was a minister in court of Kalachuri ruler. Lingayats are considered as Shiva devotees and also called as Heroes of Shiva.
They do not perform cremation(burning dead body) like other Hindu communities but bury their dead. Burial off dead is a practice followed in Islam and Christianity. So this Lingayat community is more close to foreign invading religion than Hinduism!
At a times it also seen that some Leftist Lingayat leaders oppose idol worship and want system like Islam where they do not have to pray idols.
I appreciate efforts of many religious leaders who always worked for unity for Lingayats with other sects of Hindus.
Ignored History of Kerala
Thrissur district in Kerala is a place which have seen much of violence even after independence. The ports of Malabar in Kerala have served as trading centers since many centuries. Muhammad died in Arab land in 632 AD.
Many people do not know that Cheraman Juma mosque was built in Kerala in 627 AD by Arab Islamic propagator Malik Deenar.
So now try to connect dots. Arabs invaded Sindh in 711 AD and Arabs gained influence through cultural invasion in South India around same time. So one can see why separatist trends within Hinduism started both at North West and South India around same time. Why Bhakti and Sufi movements started criticizing Vedic Hinduism and was more close to Islam.
Christian invasion in India
Gondophares founder of Indo-Parthian dynasty was not very successful and after conquering small piece of land was uprooted soon. He claimed himself to be of Zoroastrian origin. Its not clear whether these Kings themselves converted to Christianity or not. Thomas a Christian preacher came to India during his reign. He started preaching Christianity but it was in vain. He did not have military might at that time to forcibly convert people into Christianity.
Christianity arrived in India around same time it arrived in Europe. Let us now focus on Portugal invasion of Goa.
Vasco Da Gama came to India in 1498. Remember he was not a tourist but a military agent who was scouting India. Gradually missionaries started entering India from the same route which was followed by Vasco Da Gama.
Portugal rule in Goa is said to be dated around 1560 AD. The Portuguese colonial administration enacted anti Hindu laws to encourage conversions to Christianity. Laws were passed banning Christians from keeping Hindus in their employ, and the public worship of Hindus was deemed unlawful. Hindus were forced to assemble periodically in churches to listen to preaching or to refutation of their religion. Remember that Portugal along with Spanish also have history of killing Syrian Christians in Arab region.
A Hindu tortured during Portugal regime. He was found practicing Hinduism secretly.
I know I have missed many events of history and even 1000s of volumes are not enough to cover details of conspiracy against Hindus. I skipped Mughal atrocities Khiljis and British rule because most people know about that. I may write some specific details about atrocities of British and Mughals in my next article.
Remember that everything began with funding separatist trends within Hindus. Then military invasions occur. After that converted pigs act as foreign agent. In Hyderabad Arabs take young poor Muslim girls as one week wife rape them and leave them again in India. But have u seen any Muslim speaking against their Arab masters?
Speaks a lot about how conversion turns you into Mecca or Vatican slave!